Remember THIS!! A quick note -- to what is obviously no one in particular -- Richard Clarke will be giving testimony UNDER OATH on Tuesday before the 9/11 Commission for as long as they wish to talk to him. He will give that testimony in public for all to see. And "Feckless Leader"? For an hour or a little more, after much wrangling, in PRIVATE, and NOT under oath. Condi Rice spent an afternoon with the Commission already, but refuses to talk to them in public, or heaven-forbid under oath. Does that NOT strike anyone as having some significance? I suppose they wouldn't want to have answer this question? "Is it true that the Administration had advanced information that Al Queda was going to strike the United States from Richard Clarke and the CIA?" Answer: "It depends on what your definition of "is" is.